Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:46005 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752094Ab3JUGTV (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 02:19:21 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-wireless , Johannes Berg , Simon Wunderlich Subject: Re: Active scanning on DFS channels References: Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 09:19:18 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Sun, 20 Oct 2013 11:53:27 +0200") Message-ID: <87wql7tac9.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20131021_081924_438659_5DE32987) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes: >> Should we perform >> passive scan on radar channel setting new state to SCAN_DECISION and >> not to SCAN_SEND_PROBE in ieee80211_scan_state_set_channel()? > > There's a few thing we need to do and I'm working on it. > > 1) no-ibss and passive-scan flags should be merged to a no-ir flag For me IR always reminds of infrared, so the name no-ir is a bit vague to me :) -- Kalle Valo