Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:45989 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752798Ab3JUO37 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:29:59 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-wireless , Johannes Berg , Simon Wunderlich Subject: Re: Active scanning on DFS channels References: <87wql7tac9.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:29:56 +0300 In-Reply-To: (Luis R. Rodriguez's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2013 14:51:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87sivuu26z.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20131021_163002_729480_E4F8B909) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: >> "Luis R. Rodriguez" writes: >> >>>> Should we perform >>>> passive scan on radar channel setting new state to SCAN_DECISION and >>>> not to SCAN_SEND_PROBE in ieee80211_scan_state_set_channel()? >>> >>> There's a few thing we need to do and I'm working on it. >>> >>> 1) no-ibss and passive-scan flags should be merged to a no-ir flag >> >> For me IR always reminds of infrared, so the name no-ir is a bit vague >> to me :) > > Any recommendations? I'm just lazy. no-sta-tx sounds dumb, but I can't think of anything better. Sorry. -- Kalle Valo