Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:52054 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932343Ab3J1OuE (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:50:04 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id q8so2895780lbi.5 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 07:50:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1382971344.17956.27.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1382376158-25586-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1382376158-25586-2-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> <1382971344.17956.27.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:49:42 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20131028_155057_958064_6E46AAE8) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] cfg80211: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flags To: Johannes Berg Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless , Janusz Dziedzic , smihir@qti.qualcomm.com, tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > I don't think you can make this change, it breaks API and ABI because > the old IBSS flag is now ignored on input from old CRDA? I addressed that by mapping it to NO-IR in-kernel, if it was used. In other words if userspace sends it we'll respect it in the same way. Luis