Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f170.google.com ([209.85.217.170]:51804 "EHLO mail-lb0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756661Ab3J1SnM (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:43:12 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u14so3270014lbd.1 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:43:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <526E20EA.9090203@rempel-privat.de> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 12:43:10 -0600 Message-ID: (sfid-20131028_194318_743244_EAFF06D3) Subject: Re: I always need a miracle to connect with iwlwifi From: Felipe Contreras To: Krishna Chaitanya Cc: Oleksij Rempel , ilw@linux.intel.com, "hostap@lists.shmoo.com" , linux-wireless Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Felipe Contreras > wrote: > >> The authentication response does come back in both cases though, it's >> just the acknowledgement that is missing. Unfortunately I cannot >> figure out for which message it's the ack. >> >> Also, I notice the sequence number received from the router doesn't >> seem to change. All the authentication requests received have the same >> number (256). Another peculiar thing is that in the failed case the SN >> we send starts with 0. >> >> I suppose since the authentication ack never arrives, the next steps >> are never completed. >> >> Does that help? > From the supplicant logs we have successfully received the > authentication response > and sent out the association request. So are you referring to not receiving ACK > for association request?? No, from the capture there's no association request in the bad case, only in the good one. > It would be nice to get the capture without any filters? http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/wpa/wpa-bad.pcapng http://people.freedesktop.org/~felipec/wpa/wpa-good.pcapng -- Felipe Contreras