Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:53448 "EHLO mail-ie0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755478Ab3JQObn (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:31:43 -0400 Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id aq17so4010475iec.38 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 07:31:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1381995755-16471-1-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org> References: <1381995755-16471-1-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20131017_163147_169004_0F355D78) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] rt2x00: separate rt2800 PCI and SoC driver From: Helmut Schaa To: Gabor Juhos Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless , rt2x00 Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Gabor Juhos wrote: > The rt2800pci driver supports both PCI and SoC device. To achieve > this, the code uses several ifdef statements which makes the code > quite ugly. The patch set introduces a shared module, and moves the > SoC driver into a separate module to get rid of the mess. Nice series. Does this also reduce module size on when building for SoC without PCI support? Helmut