Return-path: Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:45940 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754947Ab3JMTLR (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Oct 2013 15:11:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1381691458.1301.63.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk> (sfid-20131013_211120_876105_9F08FB8A) Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlwifi: Add new firmware files for rtl8192cu From: Ben Hutchings To: Larry Finger Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 20:10:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52541E22.2040904@lwfinger.net> References: <1380234392-31062-1-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <52541E22.2040904@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ORaI+EEwE7bvq/YlWzXh" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-ORaI+EEwE7bvq/YlWzXh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 10:00 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > On 09/26/2013 05:26 PM, Larry Finger wrote: > > The vendor driver rtl8188C_8192C_8192D_usb_linux_v3.4.2_3727.20120404 > > includes new firmware files. These were extracted from data statements > > in that driver to form these files. > > > > Signed-off-by: Larry Finger > > --- > > WHENCE | 3 +++ > > rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_A.bin | Bin 0 -> 16116 bytes > > rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_B.bin | Bin 0 -> 16096 bytes > > rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_TMSC.bin | Bin 0 -> 16116 bytes > > 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_A.bin > > create mode 100644 rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_B.bin > > create mode 100644 rtlwifi/rtl8192cufw_TMSC.bin >=20 > I understand that you probably have too much to do, but I am inquiring ab= out the=20 > status of this submission and "[PATCH] rtlwifi: Add new firmware files fo= r=20 > rtl8188eu" that I sent on 09/27/2013. [...] I don't seem to have received them, but I assume the patches you sent after this are the same again. Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. - Donald Knuth --=-ORaI+EEwE7bvq/YlWzXh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAUlrwQue/yOyVhhEJAQqj1g/8DYhYUNgMTRIPfXun+nVBs9HHl8DNZkKv 1M2thaWQlV7v+JmoUERCKprAecCq14ISkLmrppRl4Mz+fawz0F/nUP5WKdgHhAZp eCrKGV5+Hh6+LHX8LlP8bFGCy2c9JP8Pn6gfBWgtUPfDd9Zn/J9CntH2vwMgq0ah xsjLZ1Qjiq5Vubqbt8AVV3un/IajUUFOgheBUe8M6u8RkV91D603ALW1O2G0ZfKn ny3Ap5sk9bjUS1z42tyJPM6w0fQ04AjqPTp14I8lD0pv45n/OUSBgVb7g3C6nMuS r3+VxN5UhWA8AeO5cJ76Kw8+dR7ZDqcEd17Iu+wvyDYRk2r3KC6QwpLJcieFCqpo kOQEmLwP8D6uIpqnhZuFpRp4tzWku8fD4DoPQT59F+fqZFvqQUlzKJsnxRCKgw96 lSS/qx1nT0nOazP+KROWy0Ico3RwihVkhh7+qYI4FCB9YEIjShOMjpPXn2b2EQVg YjgVG/52riAvbQHmTldlxRcfcEoSj64WCEVd3H+mQUtXgcWXeAdPlJQbU+NqGy3N EZ5eFMRu2ezQwXKrHVELsZBxIhWusOL+zzQ+CPINuQ+Osyi3RE/2fBKKBjpP6bBm leenM2oEp1DmeuTMgezqFV2uwSstczC/Gci1Hvpxi0wooVDtVeK/d9FW3RLbYJ1f STW7hMqCoi4= =m9Ib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ORaI+EEwE7bvq/YlWzXh--