Return-path: Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.219.43]:56419 "EHLO mail-oa0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932897Ab3JKTmj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:42:39 -0400 Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i3so2781192oag.16 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <525854AD.5020607@lwfinger.net> (sfid-20131011_214249_125375_3733B587) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 14:42:37 -0500 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felix Fietkau CC: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless Subject: Re: Regression in commit 0d528d8 References: <52571723.5020000@lwfinger.net> <52571DAA.60502@openwrt.org> In-Reply-To: <52571DAA.60502@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/10/2013 04:35 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > I don't recall any necessary extra actions introduced by this patch. > Please compare the rate selection info passed to the driver before and > after this patch, by dumping info->control.rates. I dumped the structure returned by ieee80211_get_tx_rate(hw, info) and found the same values for the case that worked and the one that failed. The values were: flags 0xc, bitrate 0xa, hw_value 0x0, and hw_value_short 0x0. Larry