Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:47787 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751932Ab3JaQfB (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:35:01 -0400 Message-ID: <1383237294.14302.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20131031_173506_944889_85033697) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] wlan: consolidate passive-scan and no-ibss flags From: Johannes Berg To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com, smihir@qti.qualcomm.com, tushnimb@qca.qualcomm.com Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 17:34:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1382376158-25586-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20131021_192242_751436_1500AA56) References: <1382376158-25586-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (sfid-20131021_192242_751436_1500AA56) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 19:22 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > John, Johannes, > > This series addresses consolidating passive-scan and no-ibss flags. > Since its crosses over drivers I'll let you guys decide what tree > this goes into. Alright, I've applied this, but in one single big patch, and I've redone (most of) the driver updates using spatch. There were conflicts applying the patch, so most likely John will get conflicts when merging my tree. I've added the spatches to the commit log so that should be easy to resolve. johannes