Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f43.google.com ([209.85.215.43]:53465 "EHLO mail-la0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085Ab3KOQHy (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:54 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n7so2966049lam.30 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:07:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <528645F9.9030708@rempel-privat.de> References: <39E4555519E9C54593B1BE31E24CB79A39B12884@nasanexd02a.na.qualcomm.com> <20131115134752.GQ9795@pogo> <52862D32.3010601@rempel-privat.de> <52863154.50105@rempel-privat.de> <528645F9.9030708@rempel-privat.de> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20131115_170757_503682_5925E42E) Subject: Re: ath9k_htc: Target is unresponsive To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: "Proffit, Jerome" , ath9k-devel , "Biard, David" , ath9k_htc_fw , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Am 15.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>> Am 15.11.2013 15:29, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: >>>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>>> I do not know which backport include patch for usb interrupt transfer. >>>> >>>> Which patch are you referring to? The backports project releases match >>>> the Linux kernel releases, so the backports-3.12 release is based on >>>> linux v3.12, we can check what kernel the patch you are describing got >>>> merged into Linux by doing: >>>> >>>> git describe --contains gitsum >>> >>> i mean: >>> >>> commit 2f5e3ecfc155449987d64028ff6b73f29cd1ef8b >>> Author: Oleksij Rempel >>> Date: Tue Aug 13 09:29:34 2013 +0200 >>> >>> ath9k_htc: do not use bulk on EP3 and EP4 >> >> OK that is upstream commit ID 2b721118b7 >> >> mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains >> 2b721118b7821107757eb1d37af4b60e877b27e7 >> v3.12-rc1~132^2~84^2^2~88 >> >> This means that patch got merged into v3.12-rc1 which means the >> backports release based on v3.12 will have it. >> >>> If it is already included, then try to revert. >> >> What do you mean? Are you saying to try to revert that patch in case >> v3.12 backports release causes issues with the card? > > yes > >> It seems the user >> of this card had issues with the v3.10 release of backports which >> would not have this patch merged. > > Ok. Thank you. So to be clear -- you would recommend testing the new v3.12 release that *has* the patch then? Luis