Return-path: Received: from mail-vc0-f179.google.com ([209.85.220.179]:61753 "EHLO mail-vc0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751700Ab3K3Mpa (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Nov 2013 07:45:30 -0500 Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ie18so7385715vcb.10 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 04:45:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Sergey Ryazanov Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 16:45:09 +0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20131130_134605_479852_1DD4F8B0) Subject: Re: wireless network interfaces and network namespaces To: Kevin Wilson Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, 2013/11/30 Kevin Wilson : > I want to verify this: all wireless interfaces do no support > network namespace. Is this true ? what in fact is the reason for this ? > Yes it is. You may use couple of virtual ethernet interfaces and bridge to carry traffic between the process that is isolated in separate namespace and a wireless interface. -- BR, Sergey