Return-path: Received: from ring0.de ([91.143.88.219]:60825 "EHLO smtp.ring0.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752481Ab3KOO4e (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:56:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:55:56 +0000 From: Sebastian Reichel To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Tony Lindgren , Luciano Coelho , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Russell King , Felipe Balbi , Sachin Kamat , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Bill Pemberton , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Luciano Coelho Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate structure Message-ID: <20131115145555.GA23351@earth.universe> (sfid-20131115_155705_180901_18C7E416) References: <1382890469-25286-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <1382890469-25286-2-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <20131114185132.GQ10317@atomide.com> <20131114230330.GB6383@earth.universe> <20131114232217.GV10317@atomide.com> <20131115143254.GA7079@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" In-Reply-To: <20131115143254.GA7079@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:32:55AM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 03:22:18PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Sebastian Reichel [131114 15:04]: > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:51:33AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > If this is not going into v3.13, these will cause conflicts > > > > with the mach-omap2/board-*.c files for v3.14. > > > >=20 > > > > So it might be best to do a minimal header patch first that > > > > can be merged in by both linux-omap and wireless trees. > > >=20 > > > I guess this patch is pretty minimal. It also seems to be acked by > > > the involved Maintainers, so maybe just merge Patch 1 without the > > > other patches? > > >=20 > > > This does not solve the problem with the struct modification from > > > the second patch, but I guess it's the more intrusive patch. > >=20 > > Once at least the first two patches are ready, how about I queue > > them after -rc1 and set up an immutable branch that can be merged > > in by linux-omap tree and the wireless tree? >=20 > That sounds reasonable to me. So what changes do you request for those patches? I will try to update them as soon as possible. -- Sebastian --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJShjX7AAoJENju1/PIO/qaOgcQAIFxSRKg6g82sFajCuGZfI7s t34ArIr0cWzxtFnPw0TE4lGaCPKmUpxdCj3568m6ejI7ZjZvZTD0rO02SS6v0jWM 7tAgYLXjoBmP4haZ1OfjJitZuQmk/YsBckAjegd3dIGeKO0xroNuIe3yfTIuVFR8 pFc6cOhFESwT2oPxjh6rAxkHBhhubXIDFnscJWc85JdhN37s8kEfIJPRpDkYWNzE 6Wun2h3/QzYPPQeVfCLUEL956Vif3Qp/KlKfPRhhd9/5LVUjKzCRij/B2jnB1Ufq aZJrRgXq8k9EvIMCUamIgtRwvi3RvhNrE3gET6F0dy9qnwYb1Iqg0CLX1tW5Rrc5 D1iAFNeYSXXyl3TtnEaoJjMjTHxIGQJhrh27eTD/ChC59kssmNCwpMEDUq13Z4NT Ve5tzgbOt3om4RVLdDux443wVbdPwNqjdnDQkLX52yQmMOec33deFTxzNtMEVakN +vSdwLhHVgdd27llrqpePQGu7ELRVPRwGAKw7JBZzFkE8kbJSzNFvevpMZHe1dDX xacBI4c4oiOPgjd7AuEepXeEIaTJ5F+Evzw7ZZPOs4A9vWpPaPm35c0dzQoswAjH MHYdO5tuUU6Tm95Fy6jj+SOTjgSlHhq0XS0HbrdgC1pC97ROoLjet3j8fV/aK/mc pTx51yqDqRfkjjWgkydn =QcUk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--