Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:52497 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751563Ab3KOQEM (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:04:12 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.138] ([79.218.105.41]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M2t0Q-1VOAX62ewg-00sekz for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:04:10 +0100 Message-ID: <528645F9.9030708@rempel-privat.de> (sfid-20131115_170426_832462_90106988) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:04:09 +0100 From: Oleksij Rempel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" CC: "Proffit, Jerome" , ath9k-devel , "Biard, David" , ath9k_htc_fw , linux-wireless Subject: Re: ath9k_htc: Target is unresponsive References: <39E4555519E9C54593B1BE31E24CB79A39B12884@nasanexd02a.na.qualcomm.com> <20131115134752.GQ9795@pogo> <52862D32.3010601@rempel-privat.de> <52863154.50105@rempel-privat.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 15.11.2013 16:33, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Am 15.11.2013 15:29, schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: >>> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >>>> I do not know which backport include patch for usb interrupt transfer. >>> >>> Which patch are you referring to? The backports project releases match >>> the Linux kernel releases, so the backports-3.12 release is based on >>> linux v3.12, we can check what kernel the patch you are describing got >>> merged into Linux by doing: >>> >>> git describe --contains gitsum >> >> i mean: >> >> commit 2f5e3ecfc155449987d64028ff6b73f29cd1ef8b >> Author: Oleksij Rempel >> Date: Tue Aug 13 09:29:34 2013 +0200 >> >> ath9k_htc: do not use bulk on EP3 and EP4 > > OK that is upstream commit ID 2b721118b7 > > mcgrof@frijol ~/linux-stable (git::master)$ git describe --contains > 2b721118b7821107757eb1d37af4b60e877b27e7 > v3.12-rc1~132^2~84^2^2~88 > > This means that patch got merged into v3.12-rc1 which means the > backports release based on v3.12 will have it. > >> If it is already included, then try to revert. > > What do you mean? Are you saying to try to revert that patch in case > v3.12 backports release causes issues with the card? yes > It seems the user > of this card had issues with the v3.10 release of backports which > would not have this patch merged. Ok. Thank you. -- Regards, Oleksij