MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8AC12462F1AA0E4EA8FEB46307AAD6F650AAB068@nasanexd02f.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <1384198356-427-1-git-send-email-rajeshc@qca.qualcomm.com>
 <1386077130.4393.21.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <CAB=NE6Xa-bdLQm8uAg9wCE0fdp4KPBZ46d5FHVHp6wCvN5=dUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1386145204.4284.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1386145241.4284.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
 <D19FD2B13A40CD4B8DA64DB9B8F112E93E5CF51C@nasanexd01a.na.qualcomm.com>
 <CAB=NE6VNZDwGj4WWkgCmWxs_xLBZhXn44vo0TEdqo84xsRbZ2Q@mail.gmail.com> <8AC12462F1AA0E4EA8FEB46307AAD6F650AAB068@nasanexd02f.na.qualcomm.com>
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 00:26:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6W3Et-4mDEet5DSDrM=yP60oODvEUGz=RtZj-gDgLNUbw@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20131220_092631_075450_2EDF8C21)
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] cfg80211: add support for frequency interference event
To: "BAHINI, Henri" <hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "Chauhan, Rajesh" <rajeshc@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Malinen, Jouni" <jouni@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"Johnson, Jeff" <jjohnson@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"Chang, Leo" <schang@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"Luo, Xun" <xunl@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"Thalappil, Sameer" <sameert@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"Hussain, Arif" <c_arifh@qca.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:16 AM, BAHINI, Henri
<hbahini@qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> Luis-
>   Can we be a bit professional here and limit the discussion to the patch that we're introducing.
>   Rajesh does not decide when the driver gets up streamed.

Let's be professional. Who the fuck decides to try to introduce APIs
for shit for drivers that are not upstream ?

>  Can we get this discussion outside of the context of this patch?

What type of serious effort are you putting into getting your driver
upstream? Otherwise it seems to me like a waste of my and other's own
time for review.

  Luis