Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:36951 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752730AbaAUQSK (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:18:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1390321084.6199.65.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140121_171814_503053_12B710E2) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] cfg80211: export minstrel best rate information through get_station() From: Johannes Berg To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: Antonio Quartulli , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:18:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52DE9BAA.6020205@open-mesh.com> References: <1390302591-3352-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <1390302591-3352-2-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <1390320014.6199.61.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <52DE9BAA.6020205@open-mesh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 17:09 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > > Actually this isn't expected throughput, but > > wouldn't something like expected throughput make even more sense? > > How should I obtain that if not with the previous operation (bitrate*prob)? Minstrel actually has some tables for that, no? This would still just only be the raw bitrate, not the actual throughput. johannes