Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:64303 "EHLO mail-bk0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751475AbaAWMKZ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2014 07:10:25 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id w10so316078bkz.38 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:10:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87ha8u6h9v.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1390473506-15677-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <87ha8u6h9v.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:10:22 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20140123_131027_941774_EE72C3DF) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: add CSA support From: Michal Kazior To: Kalle Valo Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 23 January 2014 12:59, Kalle Valo wrote: > Michal Kazior writes: > >> This is a refactored and rewritten AP CSA patch >> split into 2. As a bonus this fixes STA CSA as >> well. >> >> >> Michal Kazior (2): >> ath10k: implement channel switching >> ath10k: implement AP CSA > > Oddly enough only the cover letter was delivered to ath10k list, no idea > what happened to the patches. But I can get the patches from > linux-wireless lists. > > But do these patches depend to any mac80211 or cfg80211 patches. Or is > it safe to take these to my ath-next branch? It's safe take them. They don't have any strange dependencies. Michał