Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:45489 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752816AbaAQRoZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:44:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 09:44:16 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] wl1251 device tree support Message-ID: <20140117174415.GG7993@atomide.com> (sfid-20140117_184429_663549_88326E95) References: <1382890469-25286-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <1386289336-26704-1-git-send-email-sre@debian.org> <20140106225709.GA23070@earth.universe> <20140117014514.GA604@earth.universe> <20140117150127.GA15145@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140117150127.GA15145@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * John W. Linville [140117 07:17]: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 02:45:15AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:57:09PM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > > > > The following patchset adds device tree support to > > > > the spi variant of the wl1251 driver. > > > > > > > > Luciano Coelho (1): > > > > wl1251: split wl251 platform data to a separate structure > > > > > > > > Sebastian Reichel (4): > > > > wl1251: move power GPIO handling into the driver > > > > wl1251: spi: add vio regulator support > > > > wl1251: spi: add device tree support > > > > Documentation: dt: wireless: Add wl1251 > > > > > > What's the status of this patchset? Tony prepared an immutable > > > branch for patches 1+2 [0]. I think the other patches are also ok > > > (at least there were no more complains from the DT binding > > > maintainers). It would be nice to have wl1251 DT support in 3.14. > > > > > > [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg101165.html > > > > > > -- Sebastian > > > > ping? I can't see it on wireless-next. > > I can't pull it because the branch is based on a later source than > that of wireless-next. Hmm I thought v3.13-rc1 was the base we agreed on the immutable branch. Care to explain what the issue is merging it in? AFAIK merging it fast forwards your branch to v3.13-rc1 and then you just need to do the pull request against v3.13-rc1. Regards, Tony