Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:46895 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751788AbaAPTAV (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 14:00:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:50:16 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Arend van Spriel Cc: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , linux-wireless Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] bcma: add agent IOCTL bit values for Broadcom 802.11 and CR4 cores Message-ID: <20140116185015.GC10165@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20140116_200027_288488_7381832C) References: <1389648029-23560-1-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> <1389648029-23560-4-git-send-email-arend@broadcom.com> <52D6AA49.6000707@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <52D6AA49.6000707@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:33:29PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 01/14/2014 07:29 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > 2014/1/13 Arend van Spriel : > >> The IOCTL register in the agent/wrapper contains additional bits > >> that are core specific and use in the core reset sequence. > > > > I'm not sure about this. I don't think we want to keep device-specific > > bits in a commond (bcma's) code. > > Hi John, > > Given that I agree with Rafał's argument, can you drop patch #3 from > this series. I applied the other patches using 'git am -3' and that > works. Let me know if I should resend them. > > Gr. AvS OK. -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.