Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:36881 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754665AbaAUQAR (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jan 2014 11:00:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1390320014.6199.61.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140121_170020_632990_0D1B039E) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] cfg80211: export minstrel best rate information through get_station() From: Johannes Berg To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Antonio Quartulli Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:00:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1390302591-3352-2-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> References: <1390302591-3352-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <1390302591-3352-2-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 12:09 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > + * @prob: probability of success of this birate typo: bitrate > +struct cfg80211_minstrel_rate_info { > + u32 bitrate; > + u32 prob; > +}; Do you actually care about this, rather than bitrate*prob, ie. something like "expected throughput"? Actually this isn't expected throughput, but wouldn't something like expected throughput make even more sense? johannes