Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:52091 "EHLO mail-wi0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750743AbaATVsV (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:48:21 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id ex4so3667417wid.15 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 13:48:20 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: andrea.merello@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <52D6B31F.8080007@lwfinger.net> References: <522F584E.6000806@lwfinger.net> <52D6B31F.8080007@lwfinger.net> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:48:20 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20140120_224824_918785_925902F7) Subject: Re: RTL8187SE staging Linux driver From: Andrea Merello To: Larry Finger Cc: Bernhard Schiffner , John Linville , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry, Currently I'm struggling trying to reproduce the panic again.. Unfortunately it is working without problems now.. When it happened to you, was the RTL8187SE associated to any AP ? was there network traffic flowing ? Do you have done some other test ? do you have had more panics ? Any more information about that panic is really welcome.. Jumping back to your older mail, about your note on compile warning of rtl8187 driver, I have verified that In rtl8187 reference sources I have, the register is really accessed as 8 bit wide, while in the rtl8187se reference code (staging linux driver indeed) it is accessed in 16 bit way. I don't have a big endian system me too to test if uniforming to 16bit brokes thing, but: Despite I suspect the two ASIC have the same MAC and the same AFE, and that one of the two reference code is wrong, I can't know which one, so I'm thinking about keeping the common register struct as it is, and avoiding modify the rtl8187 driver about this, while eventually I will stick to the 16 bit access on the rtl8187se using a raw cast.. Better ideas are welcome :) Thanks Andrea Thank you Andrea On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Larry Finger wrote: > Andrea, > > Just a head's up, but I had a kernel panic overnight. This kernel (3.13-rc7 > from wireless testing) has been stable - the only thing new is the > RTL8187SE. I have no diagnostic information other than the blinking console > lights. If/when I get more info, I'll let you know. > > Larry >