Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:41069 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755856AbaAVOno (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:43:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1390401820.4334.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140122_154347_634774_429F53A0) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/5] cfg80211: export minstrel best rate information through get_station() From: Johannes Berg To: Antonio Quartulli Cc: Antonio Quartulli , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:43:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <52DFD8A5.5090800@meshcoding.com> References: <1390302591-3352-1-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <1390302591-3352-2-git-send-email-antonio@meshcoding.com> <1390320014.6199.61.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <52DE9BAA.6020205@open-mesh.com> <1390321084.6199.65.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <52DEA10F.6090700@meshcoding.com> <52DFD8A5.5090800@meshcoding.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 15:41 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > do you think that an API exporting the "expected throughput" would be a > acceptable? At that point any RC algorithm can implement it the way it > prefers. I think that's a better choice, yes. johannes