Return-path: Received: from emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi ([62.142.5.107]:57505 "EHLO emh01.mail.saunalahti.fi" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750878AbaAVJJK (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 04:09:10 -0500 Message-ID: <1390381747.4189.5.camel@porter.coelho.fi> (sfid-20140122_100915_408339_DB1E5D89) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: implement multi-interface CSA From: Luca Coelho To: Johannes Berg Cc: Michal Kazior , linux-wireless Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:09:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1390381261.4334.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1390228033-19162-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <1390228033-19162-3-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <1390318236.6199.45.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140122_095414_681765_24CF21EF) <1390381261.4334.12.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 10:01 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 09:54 +0100, Michal Kazior wrote: > > > I'd say Luca's approach has more future, as it makes channel context > > > support native. With this, I don't even see how you *could* later add > > > real channel context support. A function like this, that essentially > > > assumes exactly a single chanctx that might be doing CSA and similar > > > seems to make that rather difficult. > > > > I'm not really aware of Luca's work. > > I guess he should post it :) Yes, I have an internal patch that I wrote last year as a proof of concept. I have cut some corners (eg. the non-chanctx case Johannes mentioned), so I need to rework it a bit before posting here. > > > In any case, unless I'm missing some bigger picture this seems like a > > > really hacky way to add things, basically ignoring all the channel > > > context work. Since I care more about channel contexts, maybe we should > > > merge support for channel context CSA before we try to do the multi > > > thing. > > > > This is, I assume, Luca's work you're talking about here again. What's > > the progress on this? Any time estimates? > > I think he has patches but they break the non-chanctx case right now... I'll post the patch (as an early RFC) and explain the concept as soon as I manage to catch up with Michal's patches and all the discussions. ;) -- Cheers, Luca.