Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:32619 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752195AbaBJKyS (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 05:54:18 -0500 From: Vladimir Kondratiev To: Alexander Gordeev CC: , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] wil6210: Fix switch operator "missing break?" warning Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:54:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3132701.EBRqRlvTI9@lx-vladimir> (sfid-20140210_115433_999239_32785A77) In-Reply-To: <20140207144639.GA10939@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> References: <20140207144639.GA10939@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday, February 07, 2014 03:46:40 PM Alexander Gordeev wrote: > This update fixes a warning introduced with commit bc977ba1 > ("wil6210: Use pci_enable_msi_range() instead of pci_enable_msi_block()") > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/pcie_bus.c:65 wil_if_pcie_enable() > warn: missing break? reassigning 'use_msi' > I can't reproduce this warning. What tools used to get it? Neither gcc (I have 4.8.1) nor sparse report it. Anyway, I am fine with both 'switch' and 'if'. Thanks, Vladimir.