Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.152]:55590 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752641AbaBSJs0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 04:48:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1392803291.4733.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140219_104831_669067_75598BD1) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: Enable U-APSD AP mode support From: Johannes Berg To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Jouni Malinen , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:48:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5303DC33.5050105@openwrt.org> References: <20140218184108.GA24197@jouni.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20140218_194116_149252_F9CC32B2) <1392750354.5438.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <5303DC33.5050105@openwrt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 23:18 +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > On 2014-02-18 20:05, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2014-02-18 at 20:41 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > >> mac80211 handles the actual operations, so ath9k can just indicate > >> support for this. Based on initial tests, this combination seems to > >> work fine. > > > > I believe this is not true with aggregation sessions. > Why not? Block Ack Window handling is handled by > .release_buffered_frames just fine (and tested with PS-Poll). Yeah, n/m, I missed that you implemented that. johannes