Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vsmtp14.tin.it ([212.216.176.118]:45622 "EHLO vsmtp14.tin.it"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751317AbaBGKw5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 7 Feb 2014 05:52:57 -0500
Message-ID: <1391770326.4180.1.camel@Core2> (sfid-20140207_115301_051738_F7D706AF)
Subject: Re: Reduce tx power
From: Giuseppe Siracusano <a_siracusano@tin.it>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>, James Cameron <quozl@laptop.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 11:52:06 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20140206171606.GC20719@localhost>
References: <1391599819.4118.3.camel@Core2>
	 <20140205204013.GA29649@us.netrek.org> <20140206171606.GC20719@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Thanks to all for the replies!!

In the previous mail I'forgot to say that I've already implemented a solution based on mac filtering,
but in this case the same wireless channel would be shared among different "virtual" visibility scopes 
and the emulation is less realistic.

I'd like to compare this solution to a second one where the nodes do not share the same channel, 
and then chose the one that fits my experiment's requisites.

bye

Giuseppe Siracusano