Return-path: Received: from mail-ve0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:49075 "EHLO mail-ve0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754375AbaBUBzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:55:49 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <53062F97.3050407@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1392900697-27577-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1392900697-27577-3-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <53062F97.3050407@wwwdotorg.org> From: Chen-Yu Tsai Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:55:28 +0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20140221_025625_979801_BBA237D9) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio names To: Stephen Warren Cc: Heikki Krogerus , Johannes Berg , "David S. Miller" , Rhyland Klein , linux-wireless , netdev , linux-kernel , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 02/20/2014 05:51 AM, Heikki Krogerus wrote: >> There is no use for them in this driver. This will fix a >> static checker warning.. > > Didn't you remove the use: > > - gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, rfkill->reset_name, 0); > + gpio = devm_gpiod_get_index(&pdev->dev, NULL, 0); > > doesn't that parameter get put into the sysfs GPIO debug file, so people > can see which GPIOs are used for what? That's correct. However using con_id to pass this results in different behavior across DT and ACPI. A better way is to export the labeling function so consumers can set meaningful labels themselves. Cheers ChenYu