Return-path: Received: from senator.holtmann.net ([87.106.208.187]:56268 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752635AbaBYR7S (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2014 12:59:18 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/5] net: rfkill: gpio: cleanup and a few new acpi ids From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <1393341068.4170.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:59:07 -0800 Cc: Heikki Krogerus , "David S. Miller" , Chen-Yu Tsai , Rhyland Klein , Marc Dietrich , Stephen Warren , Linus Walleij , Arnd Bergmann , Alexandre Courbot , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Wireless" , Network Development , linux-kernel , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: (sfid-20140225_190001_790204_F172072A) References: <1393330950-7283-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1393341068.4170.7.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> To: Johannes Berg Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, >> I was waiting for the DT support from Chen-Yu before sending these, >> but decided it makes no difference when I send them. I'm dropping the >> con ID in the second patch because Dan noticed the warning, but of >> course it will mean the "gpios" property can be used with DT. >> >> The two last patches just add ACPI IDs for some new Baytrail based >> boards. > > Do these patches have any dependencies, or should I just add them to the > mac80211-next tree (since I don't keep a separate rfkill tree)? > > Or does anyone else want to take them? In that case, it's all fine with > me, I'm really just nominally the rfkill maintainer and have no idea > about these patches... :) someone has to take them. So I say go for it. Regards Marcel