Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f177.google.com ([209.85.217.177]:47628 "EHLO mail-lb0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754653AbaBSSvf (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:51:35 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f177.google.com with SMTP id 10so590618lbg.36 for ; Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:51:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1391071940-4296-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> References: <1391071940-4296-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 10:51:14 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20140219_195139_406878_96002AE6) Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cfg80211: regulatory introduce maximum bandwidth calculation To: Janusz Dziedzic Cc: linux-wireless , Johannes Berg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: > > We don't need any changes in CRDA or internal regulatory. What happens if an old kernel gets a new wireless-regdb with AUTO on all of its 5 GHz regdomain for the country it using ? I see no mention of this anywhere in the documentation and at least from the code review I just did it seemed like we'd use 0. I hope I'm wrong as otherwise that'd introduce a severe regression when this is introduced to wireless-regdb. Luis