Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com ([209.85.215.41]:39050 "EHLO mail-la0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753468AbaBVATX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Feb 2014 19:19:23 -0500 Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id mc6so3000366lab.0 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:19:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1392971299.4346.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1392900736-2808-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> <1392971299.4346.20.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:19:01 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20140222_011927_038298_BAB8B483) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: regulatory, introduce NL80211_RRF_AUTO_BW rule flag To: Johannes Berg Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , linux-wireless , John Linville Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > However, Luis, please sort out this situation, and if bits 9/10 were > ever used by userspace (they were never used by the kernel!) then please > submit a kernel patch that marks them as reserved in nl80211.h. The > kernel header file should be the master file defining the API, not some > "random" userspace tool. Pretty sure NO-HT40 was never used (claimed bit 10), and not sure why bit bit 9 says reserved, I'm pretty sure it never got used too. Luis