Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.72]:16495 "EHLO
	sabertooth01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752088AbaCXKGk (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 24 Mar 2014 06:06:40 -0400
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>
CC: <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: introduce rx_status htt template
References: <1395394437-4048-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:06:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1395394437-4048-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>
	(Janusz Dziedzic's message of "Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:33:56 +0100")
Message-ID: <87ior37vx1.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20140324_110644_463546_B5CC9CE3)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> writes:

> Introduce rx_status htt template instead of
> stack version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com>

Why? What's the benefit from doing this?

-- 
Kalle Valo