Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:56727 "EHLO mail-la0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756632AbaDVRYV (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2014 13:24:21 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id pv20so4672452lab.10 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1398180129.4211.22.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1397645621-32447-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> <1398180129.4211.22.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 10:24:00 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20140422_192427_870771_0F05D4DA) Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfg80211: reg: track crda request To: Johannes Berg , Sander Eikelenboom Cc: Janusz Dziedzic , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:53 +0200, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: >> Track CRDA request and handle timeout when no answer >> from CRDA. This could happen when crda is not available >> yet (not mounted fs), eg. during OS startup and cfg80211 >> built-in to the kernel. >> Before we could stuck when processing last request >> without ability to process current and any further >> regulatory requests. > > Hmm, this doesn't apply now on top of the patches Luis sent. Was this > the patch that was meant alternatively? Sorry I failed to pick this up amongst the threads, this one is a replacement for the my real original 2nd and 3rd patch (2nd in yesterday's series, but I hadn't redone the 3rd patch from the original series) but I rather we treat things linearly and see if we can split this up a bit, as I see this is an evolution of the work from my original 2nd patch. I'll work on this and send out something shortly. Luis