Return-path: Received: from vserver.eikelenboom.it ([84.200.39.61]:38186 "EHLO smtp.eikelenboom.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754486AbaDKUQO (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2014 16:16:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 22:16:11 +0200 From: Sander Eikelenboom Message-ID: <1423252643.20140411221611@eikelenboom.it> (sfid-20140411_221628_160050_DBC82323) To: Johannes Berg CC: Janusz Dziedzic , Janusz Dziedzic , linux-wireless , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT] cfg80211: reg: track crda request In-Reply-To: <1397247226.4643.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1397219374-3280-1-git-send-email-janusz.dziedzic@tieto.com> <2710039777.20140411192110@eikelenboom.it> <294574679.20140411220931@eikelenboom.it> <1397247226.4643.8.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Friday, April 11, 2014, 10:13:46 PM, you wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 22:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote: >> I would first like to know if Johannes likes this solution or not. > Heh, I guess that's only fair. >> With previous patches from Luis they were blocked after testing and debugging, so let him >> first speak out if he likes the approach or not. > I think this looks fine. My main complaint with Luis's patches (besides > reportedly breaking some other use cases) was that he was piggy-backing > on some completely unrelated thing to try to recover something. Here we > have an explicit delayed work struct so that seems fine. > And I really like the part where Janusz moves the delayed_work setting > where it belongs - the CRDA call function :) Ok i will duplicate the testing tomorrow somewhat more careful and report back tomorrow. > johannes