Return-path: Received: from dedo.coelho.fi ([88.198.205.34]:44382 "EHLO dedo.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751795AbaEWNcB (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2014 09:32:01 -0400 Message-ID: <1400851911.25946.42.camel@dubbel> (sfid-20140523_153206_022190_D3FD2DCB) From: Luca Coelho To: Johannes Berg Cc: michal.kazior@tieto.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 16:31:51 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1400851684.4358.41.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> References: <1400838772.4358.22.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1400844793-18069-1-git-send-email-luca@coelho.fi> <1400844793-18069-2-git-send-email-luca@coelho.fi> <1400851684.4358.41.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mac80211: use switch_vif_chanctx to change a running chanctx Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 15:28 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 14:33 +0300, Luca Coelho wrote: > > From: Luciano Coelho > > > > Instead of hammering a new channel into the running context, make use > > of the new switch_vif_chanctx to let the driver decide how to perform > > the switch. > > > > Additionally, remove the IEEE80211_HW_CHANGE_RUNNING_CHANCTX flag, > > since we never change a running context directly anymore. > > This seems totally reasonable to me, but I'll wait to see what Michal > does :) Yeah, I think so too, but if he specifically add us not to do this, it's probably because he would have trouble rebasing or something. :) -- Luca.