Return-path: Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com ([65.197.215.38]:40368 "EHLO sabertooth02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752457AbaE0Oqt (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2014 10:46:49 -0400 From: Vladimir Kondratiev To: Joe Perches CC: "John W . Linville" , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] wil6210: improve debug for WMI receive Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 17:46:45 +0300 Message-ID: <1417278.VSQeiOskQO@lx-wigig-72> (sfid-20140527_164652_721601_3E66D4FA) In-Reply-To: <1401200106.20587.0.camel@joe-AO725> References: <1401191150-29037-1-git-send-email-qca_vkondrat@qca.qualcomm.com> <1835954.xHumgOahYl@lx-wigig-72> <1401200106.20587.0.camel@joe-AO725> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 07:15:06 AM Joe Perches wrote: > Then is it an error? > Maybe use dev_notice instead. Well, it is not an error, but rather some indication of the firmware issue. I tend to agree with you and demote it to the 'debug' category; I use dynamic printk for this and it is convenient enough for both used and developer. So, I'll resubmit shortly John: can you apply other patches? I verified there are no conflicts if you drop this one. Or, do you want me to re-submit whole set? What works better for you? Thanks, Vladimir