Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:10267 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751145AbaEUOiB (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 May 2014 10:38:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 20:08:34 +0530 From: Rajkumar Manoharan To: Julian Calaby CC: Jim Davis , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next , linux-kernel , linville , linux-wireless , , netdev Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c Message-ID: <20140521143832.GA9563@qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20140521_163828_841239_DB20684D) References: <20140521110143.GA2375@qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 10:12:26PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote: > Hi Rajkumar, > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan > wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote: > >> Building with the attached random configuration file, > >> > >> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0, > >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27, > >> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18: > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’: > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ > >> has no member named ‘debug’ > >> pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts); > >> ^ > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of > >> macro ‘ath_dbg’ > >> ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \ > >> ^ > >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’ > >> has no member named ‘debug’ > >> sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts; > >> ^ > >> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1 > > > > Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS. > > The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really > unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even > if they're utterly insane. > > You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs > to prevent this from being possible. > Completely agree. But ath9k Kconfig has proper dependecy for ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS. I am wondering how it is selected w/o ATH9K_DEBUGFS. config ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS def_bool y depends on ATH9K_DEBUGFS && ATH9K_DFS_CERTIFIED Should it be like this? config ATH9K_DFS_DEBUGFS def_bool y if (ATH9K_DEBUGFS && ATH9K_DFS_CERTIFIED) -Rajkumar