Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:46475 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751210AbaEVTaS (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 15:30:18 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:22:49 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Rick Farina Cc: Ben Greear , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Question on regulatory settings. Message-ID: <20140522192249.GF12779@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20140522_213023_004453_838FEFD9) References: <537E2ABB.6030302@candelatech.com> <537E36E3.6040205@candelatech.com> <20140522183007.GE12779@tuxdriver.com> <537E4C81.3060001@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <537E4C81.3060001@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:14:09PM -0400, Rick Farina wrote: > > > On 05/22/2014 02:30 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:41:55AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > >> On 05/22/2014 09:50 AM, Ben Greear wrote: > >>> Hello! > >>> > >>> I'm having issues where when we add several ath10k NICs to a system, > >>> the regulatory domain goes quite restricted.. There is an ath9k NIC > >>> with eeprom over-ride hack, and user-space sets regdomain to 'US'. > >>> > >>> Later, when registering ath10k, at least one of those NICs registeres > >>> as 'TW'. The ending domain looks like this: > >>> > >>> [root@lf1011-13060017 ~]# iw reg get > >>> country 98: DFS-UNSET > >>> (2402 - 2472 @ 40), (N/A, 30) > >>> (5270 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 17), DFS > >>> (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (N/A, 30) > >>> > >>> > >>> I tried adding a hack to ath10k to zero out the ar->ath_common.regulatory.current_rd, > >>> but in fact it seems to be reported as zero to begin with. > >>> > >>> I am obviously missing something. Either my hacks to ath10k are not > >>> sufficient, or possibly the system is getting regulatory info from > >>> somewhere else? > >>> > >>> Any ideas where else it might be getting the idea it should be in TW > >>> domain? Can it get this from beacons from other systems? > > > > FWIW, yes it can get this information from beacons. > > > >> Ahh, sneaky nasty code....it was being set based on the timezone > >> of all things! > > > > You're welcome... ;-) > > To be fair, when I travel I rarely set my timezone at all, and when I do > I normally make sure the offset is right and not much else. It's easily > possible to have timezone set for a country you aren't in just because > the offset matches. > > I'm not saying I have a better idea, but I am saying that timezone is > very unreliable to determine position. Yes, but no less reliable than nothing at all. And if you _do_ set it properly, so much the better. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.