Return-path: Received: from mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com ([216.31.210.63]:27198 "EHLO mail-gw2-out.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751441AbaE1JHd (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 05:07:33 -0400 Message-ID: <5385A751.6090609@broadcom.com> (sfid-20140528_110741_112017_38BDBA37) Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 11:07:29 +0200 From: Arend van Spriel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans de Goede CC: Linus Walleij , Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson , "John W. Linville" , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , , , , devicetree , Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] brcmfmac: Fix OOB interrupt not working for BCM43362 References: <1401090486-4414-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1401090486-4414-10-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <5384C544.9000903@broadcom.com> <53850399.9000708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <53850399.9000708@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05/27/14 23:28, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 05/27/2014 07:03 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> On 05/26/14 09:48, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> It has taken me a long long time to get the OOB interrupt working on the >>> AP6210 sdio wifi/bt module found on various Allwinner A20 boards. In the >>> end I found these magic register pokes in the cubietruck kernel tree: >>> https://github.com/cubieboard2/linux-sunxi/commit/7f08ba395617d17e7a711507503d89a50406fe7a >>> >>> >>> I'm not entirely sure if this specific to the AP6210 module, or if this >>> should be done for all BCM43362 sdio devices. >> >> Let keep it as this for now. I added some remarks below. >> >> Regards, >> Arend >> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c >>> index 0fc707c..2369a0f 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c >>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/bcmsdh.c >>> @@ -39,7 +39,9 @@ >>> #include >>> #include >>> #include >>> +#include >>> #include >>> +#include "chip.h" >>> #include "dhd_bus.h" >>> #include "dhd_dbg.h" >>> #include "sdio_host.h" >>> @@ -119,6 +121,7 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_intr_register(struct >>> brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) >>> { >>> int ret = 0; >>> u8 data; >>> + u32 addr, gpiocontrol; >>> unsigned long flags; >>> >>> if ((sdiodev->pdata)&& (sdiodev->pdata->oob_irq_supported)) { >>> @@ -148,6 +151,21 @@ int brcmf_sdiod_intr_register(struct >>> brcmf_sdio_dev *sdiodev) >>> >>> sdio_claim_host(sdiodev->func[1]); >>> >>> + if (sdiodev->bus_if->chip == BCM43362_CHIP_ID) { >> + /* assign GPIO to SDIO core */ >>> + addr = CORE_CC_REG(SI_ENUM_BASE, gpiocontrol); >>> + gpiocontrol = brcmf_sdiod_regrl(sdiodev, addr,&ret); >>> + gpiocontrol |= 0x2; >>> + brcmf_sdiod_regwl(sdiodev, addr, gpiocontrol,&ret); >>> + >>> + /* SPROM_ADDR_HIGH ? perhaps the defines name is off */ >> >> These names are all off. These should be: >> SBSDIO_SPROM_ADDR_HIGH = SBSDIO_GPIO_SELECT >> SBSDIO_CHIP_CTRL_DATA = SBSDIO_GPIO_OUT >> SBSDIO_CHIP_CTRL_EN = SBSDIO_GPIO_EN > > Ok, so I guess I should do a pre-patch adding defines for these, should > these replace the existing defines for these addresses in: > drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio_host.h > > Or should the pre-patch add defines with the new names and keep the old > ones ? These defines are not used in the code so go ahead and replace them. It needs some more cleanup, but I can do a subsequent patch for that. Gr. AvS