Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:43100 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751524AbaFNT7K (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 15:59:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1402775942.5026.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140614_220117_799428_FFC77A22) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: WEP extra head/tail room in ieee80211_send_auth From: Johannes Berg To: Kalle Valo Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Max Stepanov Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 21:59:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sin7zzrq.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <1402419608-11892-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <1402682460.4478.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <87sin7zzrq.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 11:00 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Johannes Berg writes: > > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 20:00 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > >> From: Max Stepanov > >> > >> After skb allocation and call to ieee80211_wep_encrypt in ieee80211_send_auth > >> the flow fails with a warning in ieee80211_wep_add_iv on verification of > >> available head/tailroom needed for WEP_IV and WEP_ICV. > > > > Applied. There's still time - should that be Cc stable? > > Is this a regression? Good question. I don't think anything changed this code recently, but maybe something changed skb allocation or so? Max? johannes