Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:62982 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751964AbaFMOo3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:44:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:44:05 -0400 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Johannes Berg , David Miller , "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , "John W. Linville" , Andrew Morton , Network Development , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Intel Linux Wireless , Tom Herbert , linux-wireless Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking Message-ID: <20140613144405.GA7122@redhat.com> (sfid-20140613_164449_697024_346B9484) References: <20140612.121445.484288603919840829.davem@davemloft.net> <1402642787.4478.5.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 07:28:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Johannes Berg > wrote: > > > > is to be believed, then I'm not sure why you think iwlwifi is involved > > though. > > Mainly just because I don't see the issue on my desktop, and iwlwifi > is the only network device (apart from looback) on my laptop. And it > does say "hw checksum", so that made me think it's the driver. > > But: > > > If it's iwlwifi, then maybe that commit broke something with devices > > that don't support checksumming? > > that sounds quite possible. I see it on my router with two r8169 cards too. That does seem to support hw csum, though only on jumbo frames maybe? Dave