Return-path: Received: from purkki.adurom.net ([80.68.90.206]:50308 "EHLO purkki.adurom.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751911AbaFNIAp (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:00:45 -0400 From: Kalle Valo To: Johannes Berg Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Max Stepanov Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: WEP extra head/tail room in ieee80211_send_auth References: <1402419608-11892-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <1402682460.4478.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 11:00:41 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1402682460.4478.32.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Fri, 13 Jun 2014 20:01:00 +0200") Message-ID: <87sin7zzrq.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> (sfid-20140614_100058_159325_FF281171) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg writes: > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 20:00 +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: >> From: Max Stepanov >> >> After skb allocation and call to ieee80211_wep_encrypt in ieee80211_send_auth >> the flow fails with a warning in ieee80211_wep_add_iv on verification of >> available head/tailroom needed for WEP_IV and WEP_ICV. > > Applied. There's still time - should that be Cc stable? Is this a regression? -- Kalle Valo