Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:60275 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933084AbaFCUBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jun 2014 16:01:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1401825693.4157.44.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140603_220202_175630_3BBF5CAF) Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] cfg80211: Add channel flags limiting availability to OCB mode only From: Johannes Berg To: Rostislav Lisovy Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Sojka , s.sander@nordsys.de, jan-niklas.meier@volkswagen.de, Rostislav Lisovy , "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:01:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1401468984-24575-2-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> (sfid-20140530_185636_258190_E00F48D4) References: <1401468984-24575-1-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> <1401468984-24575-2-git-send-email-rostislav.lisovy@fel.cvut.cz> (sfid-20140530_185636_258190_E00F48D4) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2014-05-30 at 18:56 +0200, Rostislav Lisovy wrote: > IEEE 802.11p operates in its own 5.9GHz band. When there will > be a record for the 5.9GHz band in the regulatory daemon, > it must be limited to the OCB mode only -- using the newly > added flags. Is this really a *regulatory* limitation? Rather than a limitation elsewhere, e.g. the spec? johannes