Return-path: Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]:40546 "EHLO mail-we0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750750AbaFBSYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2014 14:24:41 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id t60so5674931wes.27 for ; Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:24:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87a99vz0er.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <1401370567-13543-1-git-send-email-bartosz.markowski@tieto.com> <87ppirz2ic.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87a99vz0er.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 20:24:39 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20140602_202454_102874_C7AE275D) Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix vdev map size for 10.x firmware From: Bartosz Markowski To: Kalle Valo Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , ath10k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2 June 2014 19:28, Kalle Valo wrote: > Bartosz Markowski writes: > >> On 2 June 2014 18:42, Kalle Valo wrote: >> >>> So what is the actual bug you are fixing? Previously with 10.x it was >>> possible to get only 7 VIFs, even though we advertised 8 to user space, >>> and with your fix we get the full 8 VIFs? >> >> For CAC, we use one VDEV to start monitor interface. In case of 10.X >> firmware we advertise support up to 8 VAPs, but if we spent one for >> monitor interface, only 7 left. I've noticed we fail on .add_interface >> when trying to add 8th AP, here: >> >> bit = ffs(ar->free_vdev_map); >> if (bit == 0) { >> ret = -EBUSY; >> goto err; >> } >> >> and this lead me to initialization code for vdev_map >> >> ar->free_vdev_map = (1 << TARGET_NUM_VDEVS) - 1; >> >> We have an API split for main and 10.x firmware (incl. number of >> vdevs, target fw is able to handle), but here we missed this split. > > This is a bit too technical. Basically I need a simple description of > the bug so that both kernel and distro maintainers can quicly understand > what this fix is about. Would this be correct: > > "ath10k: fix 8th virtual AP interface with DFS > > Firmware 10.x supports up to 8 virtual AP interfaces, but in a DFS > channel it was possible to create only 7 interfaces as ath10k internal > creates a monitor interface for DFS. Previous vdev map initialization > was missing enough space for 8 + 1 vdevs due to wrong define used and > that's why there was no space for 8th interface. Use the correct define > TARGET_10X_NUM_VDEVS with 10.x firmware to make it possible to create > the 8th virtual interface." > >> Ben has a valid point, the TARGET_10X_NUM_VDEVS claims to be 16, so >> there's an inconsistency between what we adverts to mac in max >> interfaces, but I'm not sure if this is such a big deal. > > I don't see that as a problem as long as we advertise 8 to user space. > >>> It would be good to clear have that in the commit log so that anyone >>> can understand what bug is fixed. >> >> Do you want me to send a v2 with just an updated commit (better user >> impact description)? (No patch content changes) > > I can update the commit log, we just need to agree on the content. The one you proposed looks good. Thanks, Bartosz