Return-path: Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:59357 "EHLO mail-pd0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751106AbaFRVuw (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:50:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pd0-f171.google.com with SMTP id fp1so1097806pdb.16 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:50:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1399798250-20987-1-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> <1399798250-20987-3-git-send-email-emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 14:50:31 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20140618_235055_631032_C86B3500) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cfg80211: introduce regulatory flags controlling bw To: Arik Nemtsov Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless , Arik Nemtsov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > Can you propose a scenario where the new flags harm something older? Using old userspace that does not have these flags set, the old mechanisms are supposed to still work. Luis