Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f45.google.com ([209.85.215.45]:44455 "EHLO mail-la0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761234AbaGRK0f (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:26:35 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ty20so2706610lab.18 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 03:26:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1405441966-32681-1-git-send-email-sw@simonwunderlich.de> References: <1405441966-32681-1-git-send-email-sw@simonwunderlich.de> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 12:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20140718_122639_383646_015D0591) Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] ath10k spectral scan support From: Janusz Dziedzic To: Simon Wunderlich Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kgiori@qca.qualcomm.com, sven@narfation.org, mathias.kretschmer@fokus.fraunhofer.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15 July 2014 18:32, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > This is the first patchset iteration for review to implement the ath10k > spectral scan feature. The patchset is still experimental, but we were > able to detect our analogue 5.8 GHz TV repeater in the sample data. :) > > As for ath9k, a proof of concept data plotter has been implemented, and > is currently available for ath10k in its own branch of FFT_eval [1]. > Tested this with fft_eval, seems works quite good. There is small problem with scan timeout, when spectral scan activated and channels with high load checked, I often hit scan timeout. Seems we should increase scan timeout in ath10k_start_scan() when spectral activated. BR Janusz