Return-path: Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182]:39120 "EHLO mail-ob0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933346AbaGOTrj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:47:39 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wm4so6265310obc.13 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 12:47:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140715193011.GE26012@tuxdriver.com> References: <1404846019-11079-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <20140715193011.GE26012@tuxdriver.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20140715_214745_347367_4D42931C) Subject: Re: [PATCH][3.16 MAYBE?] b43: don't warn about no 5 GHz support on 2.4 GHz devices From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= To: "John W. Linville" Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , b43-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15 July 2014 21:30, John W. Linville wrote: > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> This could be a bit confusing to see warning about lacking support for >> 5 GHz band if your device supports 2.4 GHz only. >> >> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki >> --- >> John: even I was quite confused to see this warning on my BCM5357. I >> suspected b43 incorrectly detected my WiFi as 5 GHz capable. I think >> that proposed behavior makes more sense. >> Do you think it's OK/worth to take it for 3.16? > > I don't really think it merits prommotion to 3.16. I am happy to > merge it for -next. OK, no problem, thanks :) -- Rafał