Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:51043 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933396AbaGOTpK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:45:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 15:30:11 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][3.16 MAYBE?] b43: don't warn about no 5 GHz support on 2.4 GHz devices Message-ID: <20140715193011.GE26012@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20140715_214907_061642_7E4EED0E) References: <1404846019-11079-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <1404846019-11079-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:00:19PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > This could be a bit confusing to see warning about lacking support for > 5 GHz band if your device supports 2.4 GHz only. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- > John: even I was quite confused to see this warning on my BCM5357. I > suspected b43 incorrectly detected my WiFi as 5 GHz capable. I think > that proposed behavior makes more sense. > Do you think it's OK/worth to take it for 3.16? I don't really think it merits prommotion to 3.16. I am happy to merge it for -next. John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.