Return-path: Received: from dedo.coelho.fi ([88.198.205.34]:47492 "EHLO dedo.coelho.fi" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbaHZQuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:50:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1409071794.585.16.camel@dubbel> (sfid-20140826_185019_041801_8D3BFA98) From: Luca Coelho To: Jim Rees , egrumbach@gmail.com Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, "ilw@linux.intel.com" Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:49:54 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20140826114123.GA2737@umich.edu> References: <20140826020721.GA1490@umich.edu> <1409032360.32368.2.camel@dubbel> <20140826114123.GA2737@umich.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: iwlwifi 35% loss rate after v3.16-rc5 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 07:41 -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > Luca Coelho wrote: > > This is probably the commit that is to blame: > > 43d826c iwlwifi: dvm: don't enable CTS to self > > Could you try again without just that one? If it's confirmed we can > revert that patch. > > Yes, reverting that one commit fixes it. Emmanuel, do you think we should revert this patch? Do you remember exactly what we tried to address with it? > Also, any chance you can get sniffer logs of the problem? > > I would be happy to if you can give me a hint how to do it. Do you just mean > a pcap, or something else? Jim, I meant an air capture with something like Wireshark. You need to have another WiFi NIC that supports monitor mode, though (like Intel's 7260 or any ath9k-based NIC). -- Cheers, Luca.