Return-path: Received: from cassarossa.samfundet.no ([193.35.52.29]:59323 "EHLO cassarossa.samfundet.no" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752422AbaHXKhc (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Aug 2014 06:37:32 -0400 Received: from pannekake.samfundet.no ([2001:67c:29f4::50] ident=unknown) by cassarossa.samfundet.no with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLVAu-0003bt-Mk for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:37:29 +0200 Received: from sesse by pannekake.samfundet.no with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XLVAu-00010E-E6 for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:37:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 12:37:28 +0200 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support Cisco DTPC IE to reduce transmit power Message-ID: <20140824103728.GA2938@sesse.net> (sfid-20140824_123812_196637_F3B11F20) References: <20140823212827.GB15466@sesse.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20140823212827.GB15466@sesse.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:28:27PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > I noticed the other day that Linux and Cisco don't always seem to speak the > same language when it comes to reducing the client transmit power. I've > written a quick patch to try to remedy it; please consider applying to > the wireless tree. I looked in the CLI as well, and it pretty clearly indicates that the range here is -127 to 127 dBm, which means I've changed my mind; this is not a two-byte value. Updated patch attached. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/