Message-ID: <1408873339.24483.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20140824_114304_023868_9CFE2B51)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] ath10k: provide firmware crash info via debugfs
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: ath10k@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:42:19 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87egw8a8zg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
References: <20140821124705.27159.67898.stgit@potku.adurom.net>
	 <20140821124907.27159.64620.stgit@potku.adurom.net>
	 <1408626616.4388.0.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
	 <877g21c3dd.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
	 <1408670355.4388.4.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
	 <87egw8a8zg.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 17:34 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:

> We really would have use for this, that's why I'm hesitant to wait more.
> Even having this from an "unofficial" location would be a big help. If
> it's ok for you, I would like to apply this once all review comments are
> addressed. But naturally if you think it's better to wait, I will do
> that.

No, I don't care what you do. I'm just saying I'm working on a
framework, so you might want to wait. If you don't, that's perfectly
fine with me.

johannes