Return-path: Received: from mail-yk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.160.175]:39798 "EHLO mail-yk0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750988AbaIJKdz (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Sep 2014 06:33:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140909182734.GJ29412@tuxdriver.com> References: <20140213201421.GJ22203@tuxdriver.com> <1397581703.8212.5.camel@x220> <1403087119.1984.93.camel@x220> <1403091974.1984.102.camel@x220> <1409911856.7832.9.camel@x220> <1409916824.7832.20.camel@x220> <20140909182734.GJ29412@tuxdriver.com> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 14:33:54 +0400 Message-ID: (sfid-20140910_123424_816309_A93F53AA) Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/28] Remove ATHEROS_AR231X From: Sergey Ryazanov To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Paul Bolle , Jiri Slaby , Nick Kossifidis , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Oleksij Rempel , Richard Weinberger , Jonathan Bither , Hauke Mehrtens , ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, open@hauke-m.de, "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , "antonynpavlov@gmail.com" , OpenWrt Development List , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , "list@hauke-m.de:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2014-09-09 22:27 GMT+04:00, John W. Linville : > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: >> 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle : >> > Hi Sergey, >> > >> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: >> >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle : >> >> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> >> >> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could >> >> >> Jiri >> >> >> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be >> >> >> submitted? >> >> > >> >> > I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If >> >> > not, >> >> > should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that >> >> > depends >> >> > on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)? >> >> > >> >> Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one >> >> round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can >> >> always find something that you really want to improve). But if you >> >> insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems >> >> that this would be better approach. >> >> >> >> 1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros >> > >> > And where can the related PULL requests or patch submissions be found? >> > >> I have not sent patches yet, since I thought that it would be easier >> to cleanup them in openwrt tree and then send them upstream. > > That excuse has worn a bit thin. Perhaps Paul should repost his > removal and you can add a revert to the start of your patch series? > As for me, I do not like such flapping, but you have a final say in this discussion as a maintainer. -- BR, Sergey