Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:44293 "EHLO mail-ig0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753163AbaIHNDJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:03:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id a13so2643868igq.9 for ; Mon, 08 Sep 2014 06:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:02:15 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: Dani Camps Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: wmediumd performance penalty Message-ID: <20140908130215.GA30071@localhost> (sfid-20140908_150313_344592_4A9A8621) References: <1409597534.2703.9.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <1409644512.1808.2.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> <20140905130325.GA26808@localhost> <20140905141039.GB26808@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 10:17:34AM +0200, Dani Camps wrote: > Hi Bob, > > Our use case is that we have some research code implemented on mac80211, > and we want to test it over a virtual testbed with wmediumd before going on > real hw. Being able to have realistic radio capacities would help us in our > testing. Ok, I see. Well, I started poking at wmediumd code a bit this weekend, and I have in mind a rewrite that would do what you want, and also do it properly unlike my other hack. I'll let you know when I have something working or you can ping me off-list if you want to talk more about it. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com